News
Google’s Gemini Enterprise for Legal puts the company deeper into the legal AI market. Its strategy suggests that integration, governance and access to trusted business systems may matter as much as model performance as law firms move AI into daily work.
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup are pressing major law firms to reflect AI-driven productivity in their fees. Their demands could accelerate a wider shift away from hourly billing and change who benefits financially when AI reduces the time needed for legal work.
Law firms are benefiting from strong demand and higher billing rates in 2026, but costs are climbing quickly. Rising salaries, technology spending and overhead could put profitability under pressure if pricing or demand growth slows.
KKR’s record $250 million HSR settlement offers a warning for frequent acquirers. The case shows why in-house teams need clear controls over document collection, outside counsel and filing approval.
Law firms are moving quickly to adopt AI, but new Thomson Reuters research points to a growing gap between strategy and execution. The next test will be whether firms can connect AI use to pricing, staffing, client service and measurable business value.
TikTok’s $400 million children’s privacy settlement shows how quickly compliance failures can become major corporate exposure. It also offers a lesson for boards and legal teams on how governance changes and remediation during litigation can influence a regulatory resolution without replacing the need for legal compliance.
The FTC’s proposed policy on personalized pricing could widen the role of in-house legal teams. Counsel may need greater oversight of customer data, pricing algorithms, disclosures and the systems that connect them.
US law school applications have reached their highest level since 2010. But a larger talent pipeline is forming as entry-level legal work changes, forcing firms and legal departments to reconsider recruitment, training and the skills future lawyers will need.
The University of Chicago Law School’s laptop ban is not an attack on artificial intelligence. It is an attempt to separate foundational legal reasoning from AI-assisted work. As generative AI reshapes professional services, the policy offers lessons for universities and employers seeking to develop critical thinking alongside technological fluency.
AI is becoming part of how legal work gets done rather than another innovation initiative.
The proposed Paramount acquisition of Warner Bros. has become more than a headline-grabbing media transaction. It illustrates how today’s corporate legal departments are expected to manage regulatory uncertainty, commercial risk, stakeholder alignment and strategic decision-making long after regulatory approvals have been secured.
Anthropic’s record-setting copyright settlement is more than a milestone for generative AI. It signals a shift in how courts may assess copyright risk across the AI development lifecycle, highlighting why corporate legal departments should scrutinize not only model outputs but also the provenance of the data used to build them.
