Regulatory

Cloudflare logo illustrating the Delaware court ruling on founder voting control and corporate governance.
What the Cloudflare ruling means for corporate governance

A Delaware court has temporarily blocked Cloudflare’s proposed share restructuring, which would have allowed its founders to sell stock while retaining voting control. The ruling tests the state’s revised corporate law and raises questions for US boards and in-house legal teams about director independence, shareholder rights and the oversight of transactions involving controlling shareholders.

ChatGPT application displayed on a smartphone as OpenAI faces lawsuits from eight US states over safety concerns.
Eight states sue OpenAI over ChatGPT safety concerns

Eight US states have sued OpenAI, accusing the company of misleading consumers about ChatGPT’s safety and failing to protect vulnerable users. The cases raise questions about how consumer protection laws apply to AI products and what the legal action could mean for corporate oversight.

Alibaba headquarters representing national security regulation and multinational business strategy.
Alibaba’s lobbying reprieve signals a new era of geopolitical legal risk

Alibaba’s temporary victory over a US lobbying restriction extends beyond one company’s legal dispute. The case highlights how national security measures are evolving into broader governance, compliance and strategic risks for multinational businesses. For in-house lawyers and business leaders, the ruling offers an early look at how constitutional challenges and geopolitical regulation may shape corporate decision-making in the years ahead.

The US Supreme Court ruling reshapes oversight of independent federal agencies.
What the Supreme Court’s latest ruling means for businesses navigating regulation

The Supreme Court’s latest ruling on independent federal agencies is more than a constitutional milestone. For businesses, it marks a significant development in the regulatory environment that corporate legal teams monitor every day.

The US Supreme Court's decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell could reshape Roundup litigation by reinforcing federal preemption over EPA-approved pesticide labeling.
Why Bayer’s latest legal victory matters beyond Roundup

The Supreme Court’s decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell marks a significant moment in Roundup litigation, reinforcing federal preemption under FIFRA and raising broader questions about the relationship between federal regulation and state product liability claims.

Matt Royack
Matt Royack, General Counsel at Cision, navigates shifting regulations and data demands through consistent execution

Market shifts, data proliferation, and regulation create pressure for companies that operate across media, technology, and communications.